Skip to main content

Ending this blog

I have decided, at least for now, to end this blog.

Why?  There are several reasons.  Firstly, I have only 13 followers here. Word of mouth never took off to get me enough followers to make it worth continuing on.

Second, movie-going enough to maintain a film review blog is beyond expensive. I just don't have the funds to pursue it. I'd need to have people send me to the movies to review films they want me to review, which would require donations from followers, which, see "only 13 followers," above.

Finally, a lot of times after I do go to see a movie, I just don't sit down to write the requisite review, which is my fault, but if it's not going to get done, well, there you have it. 

I'm sorry to those of you who enjoy the blog. I'd like to continue it, but I just don't have the cash combined with the time and energy to be an independent film reviewer. I'll leave the reviews I have written up, and maybe from time to time I'll post something film-related here. If the day ever comes when I can support it, then we shall see.

Until then, it's been an interesting experiment even if it showed me that there's not enough interest in MY thoughts on movies to continue the pursuit.

Comments

  1. Timothy S. BrannanOctober 24, 2012 at 3:56 PM

    Sorry to see this one go.

    ReplyDelete
  2. faoladhOctober 24, 2012 at 11:58 PM

    Well, you've written a total of 15 entries, with several at the rate of no more than one a month. In my blogs, when I had so few entries, I don't think I had more than 10 followers in either one, so you've actually done pretty well. It takes time and content to build readership. Plus, the number of followers is only an indicator, as many readers will be reading through RSS feeds or other methods than the "Google Friend Connect" method.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Grey ElfDecember 17, 2012 at 11:45 AM

    Guess I was a bit premature. Two new reviews have gone up since this entry was posted...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Marcus Nispel's Conan the Barbarian (2011)

I posted this review in a slightly different format on my older blogs, but since Conan came out on Blu Ray and DVD a few months ago, and has been making the rounds on cable and On Demand, it seemed a good way to kick off my blog.  Plus, someone requested it. The promised reviews of John Carter and The Hunger Games will follow soon.   Fair warning: there will be minor spoilers in this review.  Nothing major, but if you're avoiding spoilage altogether, you might give this a pass. Introduction First things first.  This is absolutely not a remake of the Arnold one .  The only thing it has in common is the "revenge for my dad's death" plot.  The events of the story are completely, 100% new (well, new as in, they weren't anywhere to be found in the Arnold flicks).  So that's something. A new Conan film has been in Development Hell since 1984’s Conan the Destroyer . Various incarnations have come and gone, all of which have generated varyi...
9 comments
Read more

Review: Peter Jackson's The Hobbit - An Unexpected Journey

Introduction The biggest buzz in movie news these days is the release of Peter Jackson's The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. The film slammed the box office this weekend, dominating in a way that even its predecessors in the Lord of the Rings trilogy did not. The film pulled in nearly $223 million at the box office its opening weekend, and that was with a traditional Friday opening rather than the oh-so-trendy "Wednesday opening to pad the numbers" tactic. The movie is news for several reasons. The obvious, of course, is that it's the long-awaited completion of the story of the Baggins clan as written by J.R.R. Tolkien, an adaptation of the prelude (not prequel, for this book was in fact written first) to the longer, epic Lord of the Rings. The second is Jackson's decision to shoot the film in 48 fps "High Frame Rate" (or HFR) format. For around 100 years now, films have been shot in 24 frames per second; the argument in favor of HFR is that the faster...
5 comments
Read more

Review: No Time to Die

Before I get started, let me be clear that there will be minor spoilers in this review. Minor ones. It's really impossible to talk about what sets this flick apart without that. But I'll try to keep them to things that won't ruin the experience.  No Time to Die may be the most eagerly anticipated James Bond film ever made. It ends Daniel Craig's historic run as the seminal and iconic antihero, secret agent, and assassin in explosive fashion. This one has been a critical darling, but the fanbase seems wildly split. Let's be fair, though: a lot of the negative fan reaction comes from "fans" who haven't seen the film and are knee-jerking something that's quite frankly, not even a thing in the movie.  I'll get it out of the way without taking a stand on whether it would be a good or bad thing. James Bond is not turned into a black woman, nor is he changed in any way whatsoever. Bond is still Bond, through and through, and as a very minor spoiler ju...
1 comment
Read more